STM-1:Automatic Protection Switching - Revision history

Allyntree at 19:12, 24 April 2018

2018-04-24T19:12:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 24 April 2018
Line 35:		Line 35:

	[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]		[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]

	~~[[category:Needs revising]]~~

Allyntree: /* Revertive vs non-revertive */

2018-04-24T19:11:36Z

Revertive vs non-revertive

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 24 April 2018
Line 24:		Line 24:
	=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===		=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===

	This configuration ~~options~~ only specifies if the traffic is automatically switched back to its original channel once the failure is cleared. When in ‘non-revertive’ mode, the traffic will remain on the protection fiber until manually switched back or until a failure is detected on the protection fiber (the failure would need to be of higher priority than any failure already present on the working channel). ~~That later~~ case would then be considered as yet another protection switching (from the protection channel to the working channel). In ‘revertive’ mode, the switch-back operation is done automatically by the system. To avoid creating oscillation situation (where the voice/data is constantly switched back and forth to the protection channel), a configurable probing period (called the ‘wait-to-restore’) is applied. If no error occurred during the probing period (which could last from seconds to hours depending on user configuration), the switch-back will occur.		This configuration option only specifies if the traffic is automatically switched back to its original channel once the failure is cleared. When in ‘non-revertive’ mode, the traffic will remain on the protection fiber until manually switched back or until a failure is detected on the protection fiber (the failure would need to be of higher priority than any failure already present on the working channel). In this case it would then be considered as yet another protection switching (from the protection channel to the working channel). In ‘revertive’ mode, the switch-back operation is done automatically by the system. To avoid creating an oscillation situation (where the voice/data is constantly switched back and forth to the protection channel), a configurable probing period (called the ‘wait-to-restore’) is applied. If no error occurred during the probing period (which could last from seconds to hours depending on user configuration), the switch-back will occur.

	~~The~~ TelcoBridges equipment supports both Revertive and non-revertive switching modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface. This setting applies to both the unidirectional and bidirectional mode of operations.		TelcoBridges equipment supports both Revertive and non-revertive switching modes as per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface. This setting applies to both the unidirectional and bidirectional mode of operations.

	=== Ring Topology ===		=== Ring Topology ===

Allyntree: /* Unidirectional vs bidirectional */

2018-04-24T19:09:37Z

Unidirectional vs bidirectional

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 24 April 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:
	=== Unidirectional vs bidirectional ===		=== Unidirectional vs bidirectional ===

	This configuration parameter refers to the APS switching protocol established between the two facing devices. In a unidirectional operation mode, the device that detects a failure on a working channel no. 1 (let’s assume ‘Equipment E’) requests to the remote equipment (let’s assume ‘Equipment F’ to drive the signal ~~that~~ specific working channel data to the protection line.		This configuration parameter refers to the APS switching protocol established between the two facing devices. In a unidirectional operation mode, the device that detects a failure on a working channel no. 1 (let’s assume ‘Equipment E’) requests to the remote equipment (let’s assume ‘Equipment F’) to drive the signal o a specific working channel data to the protection line.

	Once this request is acknowledged, Equipment E now starts to ‘listen’ to the protection channel but still drives its signal on to the working channel. This configuration option makes the actual bidirectional voice/data path to be split into two different fibers (TX on working channel 1 and RX on protection channel). This methodology has the potential of surviving a dual fiber failure as long as both failures are not in the same ~~directions~~. That means that Equipment F could later ~~requests~~ for ~~the~~ working channel 3 to be driven to the protection channel. In such event, the protection channel would transport working channel 1 in one direction and working channel 3 is the other direction.		Once this request is acknowledged, Equipment E now starts to ‘listen’ to the protection channel but still drives its signal on the working channel. This configuration option makes the actual bidirectional voice/data path to be split into two different fibers (TX on working channel 1 and RX on protection channel). This methodology has the potential of surviving a dual fiber failure as long as both failures are not in the same direction. That means that Equipment F could later request for working channel 3 to be driven to the protection channel. In such an event, the protection channel would transport working channel 1 in one direction and working channel 3 is the other direction.

	When configured for bidirectional switch-over, the APS protocol will make sure that both ~~direction~~ of the failed working channel is switched to the protection fiber pair (regardless if one of the directions is still working). This makes the management of the fiber a little easier as a fiber can carry (or not) traffic rather than be transporting traffic in a single direction.		When configured for bidirectional switch-over, the APS protocol will make sure that both directions of the failed working channel are switched to the protection fiber pair (regardless if one of the directions is still working). This makes the management of the fiber a little easier as a fiber can carry (or not) traffic rather than be transporting traffic in a single direction.

	~~The~~ TelcoBridges equipment supports both unidirectional and bidirectional operation modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface.		TelcoBridges equipment supports both unidirectional and bidirectional operation modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface.

	=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===		=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===

Allyntree: Needs revising edit

2018-04-24T19:06:46Z

Needs revising edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:06, 24 April 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	<br />		<br />
	<br />		<br />
	Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of ~~equipments~~ and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending of the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair ~~in case of~~ problems detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one ~~time~~ the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these ~~system~~, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too ~~much~~ expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used ~~dedicated~~ the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is in problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In modular 1:N system~~, the case~~ where N=1 ~~exists but~~ still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.		Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of equipment and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending on the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair when problems are detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one times the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such a product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these systems, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used to dedicate the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is experiencing a problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In a modular 1:N system where where N=1, it still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.

	[[Image:APS-linear-topology.jpg\|\|\|Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a linear topology.]]		[[Image:APS-linear-topology.jpg\|\|\|Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a linear topology.]]

	~~The~~ TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can ~~contains~~ the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.		TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can contain the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.

	=== Unidirectional vs bidirectional ===		=== Unidirectional vs bidirectional ===

Sylvain Fontaine at 15:23, 26 July 2013

2013-07-26T15:23:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 26 July 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Automatic Protection Switching on [[STM-1]] connections is supported by [[Tmedia]] media gateways and [[Tdev]] development platforms.		Automatic Protection Switching on [[STM-1]] connections is supported by [[Tmedia]] media gateways and [[Tdev]] development platforms.
			<br />
			APS [[STM-1]] protection is also known as Multiplexing Section Protection (MSP)
	=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===		=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===
	As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''only the linear configuration is supported'''.		As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''only the linear configuration is supported'''.

Sylvain Fontaine at 20:52, 7 November 2012

2012-11-07T20:52:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 7 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Automatic Protection Switching on [[STM-1]] connections is supported by [[Tmedia]] media gateways and [[Tdev]] development platforms.		Automatic Protection Switching on [[STM-1]] connections is supported by [[Tmedia]] media gateways and [[Tdev]] development platforms.


	~~== SONET/SDH topologies ==~~


	~~=== Ring Topology ===~~

	The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''only the linear configuration is supported'''.

	~~[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]~~



	=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===		=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===
			As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''only the linear configuration is supported'''.
			<br />
			<br />
	Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of equipments and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending of the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair in case of problems detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one time the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these system, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too much expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used dedicated the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is in problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In modular 1:N system, the case where N=1 exists but still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.		Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of equipments and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending of the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair in case of problems detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one time the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these system, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too much expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used dedicated the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is in problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In modular 1:N system, the case where N=1 exists but still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.


	[[Image:APS-linear-topology.jpg\|\|\|Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a linear topology.]]		[[Image:APS-linear-topology.jpg\|\|\|Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a linear topology.]]


	The TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can contains the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.		The TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can contains the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.
Line 31:		Line 19:
	When configured for bidirectional switch-over, the APS protocol will make sure that both direction of the failed working channel is switched to the protection fiber pair (regardless if one of the directions is still working). This makes the management of the fiber a little easier as a fiber can carry (or not) traffic rather than be transporting traffic in a single direction.		When configured for bidirectional switch-over, the APS protocol will make sure that both direction of the failed working channel is switched to the protection fiber pair (regardless if one of the directions is still working). This makes the management of the fiber a little easier as a fiber can carry (or not) traffic rather than be transporting traffic in a single direction.

	The TelcoBridges equipment supports both ~~of these~~ operation modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface.		The TelcoBridges equipment supports both unidirectional and bidirectional operation modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface.

	=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===		=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===
Line 37:		Line 25:
	This configuration options only specifies if the traffic is automatically switched back to its original channel once the failure is cleared. When in ‘non-revertive’ mode, the traffic will remain on the protection fiber until manually switched back or until a failure is detected on the protection fiber (the failure would need to be of higher priority than any failure already present on the working channel). That later case would then be considered as yet another protection switching (from the protection channel to the working channel). In ‘revertive’ mode, the switch-back operation is done automatically by the system. To avoid creating oscillation situation (where the voice/data is constantly switched back and forth to the protection channel), a configurable probing period (called the ‘wait-to-restore’) is applied. If no error occurred during the probing period (which could last from seconds to hours depending on user configuration), the switch-back will occur.		This configuration options only specifies if the traffic is automatically switched back to its original channel once the failure is cleared. When in ‘non-revertive’ mode, the traffic will remain on the protection fiber until manually switched back or until a failure is detected on the protection fiber (the failure would need to be of higher priority than any failure already present on the working channel). That later case would then be considered as yet another protection switching (from the protection channel to the working channel). In ‘revertive’ mode, the switch-back operation is done automatically by the system. To avoid creating oscillation situation (where the voice/data is constantly switched back and forth to the protection channel), a configurable probing period (called the ‘wait-to-restore’) is applied. If no error occurred during the probing period (which could last from seconds to hours depending on user configuration), the switch-back will occur.

	The TelcoBridges equipment supports both ~~of these~~ switching modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface. This setting applies to both the unidirectional and bidirectional mode of operations.		The TelcoBridges equipment supports both Revertive and non-revertive switching modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface. This setting applies to both the unidirectional and bidirectional mode of operations.

			=== Ring Topology ===
			As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''Ring topology is not supported'''
			<br />
			<br />
			The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''only the linear configuration is supported'''.

			[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]

	[[category:Needs revising]]		[[category:Needs revising]]

Cboulanger: Changed title from 'supported topologies' to 'SONET/SDH topologies' as we don't support anything other than linear

2012-11-07T20:39:16Z

Changed title from 'supported topologies' to 'SONET/SDH topologies' as we don't support anything other than linear

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 7 November 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:


	== ~~Supported~~ topologies ==		== SONET/SDH topologies ==


	=== Ring Topology ===		=== Ring Topology ===

	The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), only the linear configuration is supported.		The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), '''only the linear configuration is supported'''.

	[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]		[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]

Ktrueman: added graphics

2010-07-09T18:56:37Z

added graphics

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 9 July 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), only the linear configuration is supported.		The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), only the linear configuration is supported.

			[[Image:APS-ring-topology.jpg\|\|\| Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a ring topology.]]



	=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===		=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===

	Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of equipments and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending of the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair in case of problems detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one time the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these system, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too much expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used dedicated the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is in problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In modular 1:N system, the case where N=1 exists but still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.		Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of equipments and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending of the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair in case of problems detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one time the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these system, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too much expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used dedicated the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is in problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In modular 1:N system, the case where N=1 exists but still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.


			[[Image:APS-linear-topology.jpg\|\|\|Graphic showing Automatic Protection Switching for STM-1 in a linear topology.]]


	The TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can contains the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.		The TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can contains the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.

Ktrueman: initial content copied from internal document

2010-07-09T18:52:15Z

initial content copied from internal document

New page

Automatic Protection Switching on [[STM-1]] connections is supported by [[Tmedia]] media gateways and [[Tdev]] development platforms.

== Supported topologies ==

=== Ring Topology ===

The Automatic Protection Switching scheme differs depending on whether the equipment is part of a SONET/SDH ring or if it is used as terminal equipment. For a ring network, traffic is diverted from the failed data path toward the opposite direction of the ring through a backup path. Thus, the data can reach its destination by moving the other way around the ring (refer to Figure 12). Linear topology is simpler as both devices are facing each other and decide (mutually or not according to configuration option) to switch the data traffic to a backup fiber upon detection of a failure. As the TelcoBridges device is a terminating device (not an add/drop/mux), only the linear configuration is supported.

=== Linear Topology: 1+1, 1:n and 1:1 ===

Linear topology leads to different configuration of protection fibers depending on the type of equipments and their capabilities (see Figure 13). The ‘1+1’ configuration means that a supplementary fiber pair (called the ‘protection channel’) is dedicated to protect the primary fiber pair (referred to as ‘working channel 1’). Depending of the operation (unidirectional or bidirectional) and switching configuration (revertive or non-revertive), the data/voice traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair in case of problems detected on the primary fiber pair. Equipment of this type usually can terminate the totality of the SONET/SDH payload content to the local network. Some equipment has the capability to support more than one time the SONET/SDH payload (10 times an STM-1 rate for example) and to terminate it to a local network. In such product, more than one fiber pair is required in order to transport the payload. For these system, using a 1+1 redundancy scheme would be too much expensive as there would be a protection fiber pair for each working channel. For these applications, the ‘1:N’ scheme is used dedicated the supplementary fiber pair (the protection channel) to protect all of the N working channels (N=10 in the previous mentioned example). When one of the working channels is in problem, the voice/data traffic is redirected to the protection fiber pair. As an option, the protection channel may also transport extra traffic when it is not actively protecting a working channel (with the consequence of loosing this extra channel when a protection switch is required). In modular 1:N system, the case where N=1 exists but still behaves as a simplification of a 1:N system. Thus, extra traffic would be still be allowed providing the hardware platform supports it.

The TelcoBridges equipment supports the STM-1/OC3 level of transports (155Mbps) in a single fiber. Since this data rate can contains the complete voice/data payload from the local side of the blade, the only supported redundancy scheme is 1+1.

=== Unidirectional vs bidirectional ===

This configuration parameter refers to the APS switching protocol established between the two facing devices. In a unidirectional operation mode, the device that detects a failure on a working channel no. 1 (let’s assume ‘Equipment E’) requests to the remote equipment (let’s assume ‘Equipment F’ to drive the signal that specific working channel data to the protection line.

Once this request is acknowledged, Equipment E now starts to ‘listen’ to the protection channel but still drives its signal on to the working channel. This configuration option makes the actual bidirectional voice/data path to be split into two different fibers (TX on working channel 1 and RX on protection channel). This methodology has the potential of surviving a dual fiber failure as long as both failures are not in the same directions. That means that Equipment F could later requests for the working channel 3 to be driven to the protection channel. In such event, the protection channel would transport working channel 1 in one direction and working channel 3 is the other direction.

When configured for bidirectional switch-over, the APS protocol will make sure that both direction of the failed working channel is switched to the protection fiber pair (regardless if one of the directions is still working). This makes the management of the fiber a little easier as a fiber can carry (or not) traffic rather than be transporting traffic in a single direction.

The TelcoBridges equipment supports both of these operation modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface.

=== Revertive vs non-revertive ===

This configuration options only specifies if the traffic is automatically switched back to its original channel once the failure is cleared. When in ‘non-revertive’ mode, the traffic will remain on the protection fiber until manually switched back or until a failure is detected on the protection fiber (the failure would need to be of higher priority than any failure already present on the working channel). That later case would then be considered as yet another protection switching (from the protection channel to the working channel). In ‘revertive’ mode, the switch-back operation is done automatically by the system. To avoid creating oscillation situation (where the voice/data is constantly switched back and forth to the protection channel), a configurable probing period (called the ‘wait-to-restore’) is applied. If no error occurred during the probing period (which could last from seconds to hours depending on user configuration), the switch-back will occur.

The TelcoBridges equipment supports both of these switching modes per a configuration setting when allocating the OC3/STM1 line interface. This setting applies to both the unidirectional and bidirectional mode of operations.

[[category:Needs revising]]